Persepsi Masyarakat Lokal Terhadap Pengembangan Hutan Mangrove Sebagai Kawasan Ekowisata Di Kampung Ruar Distrik Biak Timur Kabupaten Biak Numfor
This Work is licensed under: Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License
Abstract
The mangrove forest area of Kampung Ruar, East Biak District, is an area that has traditionally been a place for fishing and lime-making efforts by the community who have been hereditary. This condition raises questions from various parties whether this location is suitable to be developed as a mangrove ecotourism destination. Development of Mangrove Ecotourism by the Papua Provincial Forestry Service as a tourist attraction by utilizing local natural potential and supporting tourism policies in Biak Numfor Regency. This study aims to see the socio-cultural conditions of local communities in the Mangrove Forest Area of Kampung Ruar, Biak Timur District, Biak Numfor Regency as an ecotourism area and to assess the local community's perceptions of the development of ecotourism areas in providing benefits to the community both economically and socio-culture in Kampung Ruar Distik Biak Regency. Timur Biak. The study hasli revealed that the perception of local communities about ecotourism (60%), community knowledge about resources (70%) and understanding of community knowledge about forest damage and aspects of forest protection are very good (67), most (49%) people who understand that the potential for ecotourism development has future prospects. The four alternative strategies for mangrove ecotourism in Kampung Ruar, Biak Timur District, Biak Numfor District in Kampung Ruar are as follows: (a) Development of a Tour Package between Mangrove Ecotourism and TBTA Biak; (b) Increase Knowledge and Community Empowerment; (c) Mangrove Rehabilitation and Community Empowerment; and (d) Mentoring and involvement of local communities in management.
References
Adrian, H., Hadi, S. and Nurisjah, S. (2016) ‘Perencanaan Lanskap Kawa-san Wisata Berkelanjutan Di Keca-matan Cisarua, Kabupaten Bogor’, Jurnal Lanskap Indonesia, 8(2), pp. 53–69. doi: 10.29244/jli.2016.8.2.53-69.
Albuquerque, U. P. et al. (2018) ‘Hu-mans as niche constructors: Revi-siting the concept of chronic anthro-pogenic disturbances in ecology’, Perspectives in Ecology and Conservation, 16(1), pp. 1–11. doi: 10.1016/j.pecon.2017.08.006.
Dinas Kehutanan Provinsi Papua, 2018, Data Statistik Dinas Kehutanan Provinsi Papua Tahun 2017
Dewi Indah Novita, San Afri Awang, Wahyu Andayani dan Priyono Sur-yanto, (2017) Pengembangan Ekowi-sata Kawasan Hutan Dengan Skema Hutan Kemasyarakatan Di Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta. (Development Of Forest Area Ecotourism With Community Forest Scheme In Dae-rah Istimewa Yogyakarta) Manusia & Lingkungan, 2017, 24(2):95-102, DOI:10.22146/jml.38566
Fatem, S. M. (2019) ‘Connecting social forestry to conservation policies in Tanah Papua’, Forest and Society, 3(1), pp. 141–147. doi: 10.24259/fs. v3i1.5865.
Imam Ghozali, (2011). Aplikasi Analisis Multivariate dengan Pro-gram IBM SPSS 19, (Semarang: Badan Penerbit Universitas Dipone-goro, 2011)
Joa, B., Winkel, G. and Primmer, E. (2018) ‘The unknown known – A review of local ecological knowledge in relation to forest biodiversity conservation’, Land Use Policy. Elsevier, 79(May), pp. 520–530. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.09.001.
Kanel, K. R. and Shrestha, K. (2001) ‘Tropical Secondary Forests in Nepal And Their Importance to Local People’, 13(4), pp. 691–704.
Karsudi, Soekmadi, R. and Kartodihardjo, H. (2010). ‘Ecoto-urism Development Strategy in the Yapen Islands, Papua Province’, Manajemen Hutan Tropika, 16(3), pp. 148–154.
Kellert, S. R. et al. (2000). ‘Community Natural Resource Management: Promise, Rhetoric, and Reality School o f F orestry and E nvironm ental Studies Yale U niversity N ew H aven, C onnecticut, U SA’, Society and Natural Resources, 13, pp. 705–715.
Koentjaraningrat, R.M., (1990). Pokok-pokok Antropologi Sosial. PT Dian Rakyat. Jakarta.
Klooster, D.J., (2002). Toward Adap-tive Community Forest Management: Integrating Local Forest Knowledge withScientific Forestry. Jurnals Economic Geography, 78(1):43-70.
Maruf et al, (2018). Persepsi dan sikap Masyarakat terhadap Pengembangan Ekowisata Mangrove Bungkutoko Kendari. Fakultas Kehutanan dan Ilmu Lingkungan, Universitas Halu Oleo. Ecogreen Vol. 4 No. 1, April 2018Halaman 43 – 51
Maryudi, A. et al. (2012) ‘Forest Policy and Economics Back to basics : Considerations in evaluating the outcomes of community forestry’, 14, pp. 1–5. doi: 10.1016/j.forpol. 2011.07.017.
Naah, J. B. S. N. and Guuroh, R. T. (2017) ‘Factors influencing local ecological knowledge of forage resources: Ethnobotanical evidence from West Africa’s savannas’, Journal of Environmental Manage-ment. Elsevier Ltd, 188, pp. 297–307. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2016. 11.064.
Pratiwi S. (2008). Model pengem-bangan institusi ekowisata untuk penyelesaian konflik di Taman Nasi-onal Gunung Halimun Salak. [diser-tasi]. Bogor: Sekolah Pascasarjana. Institut Pertanian
Rumengan et al, (2011). Strategi Pengembangan Ekowisata Di Kelu-rahan Lemo dan Sarira Kec. Makale Utara Kab. Tana Toraja, Program Studi Pengelolaan Lingkungan Hi-dup, Universitas HasanuddinFakultas Kehutanan, Universitas Hasanuddin (2011). Email: sel_vcn@yahoo.com
Ungirwalu, A. et al. (2017) ‘The ethno-techno-conservation approach in the utilization of Black Fruit (Haplo-lobus sp.) by the Wandamen ethnic of Papua, Indonesia’, 18(4), pp. 2085–4722. doi: 10.13057/biodiv/ d180408.
Waliki, Y., Tjolli, I. and Warami, H. (2020) ‘Perilaku Masyarakat dalam Mengelola Sampah Rumah Tangga di Distrik Manokwari Timur Kabupaten Manokwari’, 3(2), p. 15.
Wiratna Sujarweni, 2014. SPSS untuk Penelitian, (Yogyakarta: Pustaka Baru Press, 2014).
Copyright (c) 2021 Ferdinand Rumbino, Soetjipto Moeljono, Antoni Ungirwalu

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.







